section image

Power HIL Test Stand for EV Battery Systems

Power HIL Test Stand for EV Battery Systems
Hardware-in-the-Loop power emulation platform for safe, accelerated BMS and power electronics validation
Key Results
70%
reduction in BMS validation cycle time
120+
automated test scenarios executed per firmware release
Client
EV powertrain developers and battery system integrators need to validate Battery Management Systems thoroughly before connecting them to real high-voltage packs. The alternative — bench testing with live lithium cells — is slow, expensive, and carries real risk of thermal events, cell damage, and equipment loss. Development programs that can't afford those risks need a better path.
Objective
Design and deliver a Hardware-in-the-Loop test stand that electrically emulates an EV battery pack — giving engineers a safe, programmable power source that reproduces realistic cell behavior, fault conditions, and edge cases. The system needed to integrate with the BMS under test via CAN bus, execute automated test sequences, and produce traceable pass/fail records for every firmware build.
Location:
USAUSA
Development time:
4 months
Cooperation period:
Ongoing
Project Team
Project manager
Analyst
Business Analyst
AI Ops Manager
Generative AI Product Manager
Embedded Engineer
Device Driver Developer
Work Approach
Electrically accurate emulation
Fault injection by design
Real-time closed-loop control
Pipeline-integrated validation

Electrically accurate emulation

The HIL stand doesn't approximate battery behavior — it models it. Cell-level SoC curves, internal resistance profiles, temperature-dependent impedance, and pack-level voltage dynamics are all parameterizable, so the BMS under test cannot distinguish the emulator from real cells.

Fault injection by design

Over-voltage, under-voltage, cell imbalance, sudden load transients, communication loss, and sensor failures are all first-class test scenarios — not afterthoughts. Engineers define fault sequences in YAML and the system executes them reproducibly.

Real-time closed-loop control

The emulator responds to BMS commands within 500us, maintaining physical accuracy under dynamic load conditions — the kind that expose firmware bugs that static bench tests never catch.

Pipeline-integrated validation

Every firmware commit triggers an automated test run. Results are logged, compared against baseline, and flagged before the build reaches hardware — turning validation from a bottleneck into a continuous process.

Technical Architecture
Power Emulation Hardware
Real-Time Control Layer
Test Management
Integrations

Power Emulation Hardware

  • Programmable bidirectional DC supply with <1ms transient response
  • Cell-level emulation: configurable SoC, SoH, and internal resistance per cell group
  • Voltage range: 0-800V (compatible with 400V and 800V EV architectures)
  • Current range: up to 500A peak emulation capability

Real-Time Control Layer

  • Real-time controller: FPGA-based with <500us closed-loop latency
  • Hardware I/O: CAN FD, LIN, SPI, analog I/O for BMS interfacing
  • Isolation: 1500V galvanic isolation between emulator and control system

Test Management

  • Scenario language: YAML-based test scripts with parameterized fault injection
  • Automated pass/fail evaluation against defined acceptance criteria
  • Full data logging: voltage, current, temperature, CAN traffic, per millisecond
  • Auto-generated test reports (PDF / HTML) per firmware build

Integrations

  • CAN FD for BMS communication (SAE J1939, AUTOSAR ComStack, custom protocols)
  • Git-triggered CI/CD pipeline for automated firmware validation
  • InfluxDB + Grafana for test trend analysis across firmware versions
Results
Validation Speed
Safety Record
Firmware Quality

Validation Speed

Multi-day hardware setup cycles are gone. Overnight automated runs now cover the full regression suite — 120+ scenarios — and deliver a complete test report before the engineering team starts the next day.

Safety Record

Zero thermal events, zero cell damage, zero equipment failures during the entire test program. Removing real batteries from early-stage validation eliminated the category of risk entirely.

Firmware Quality

Bugs that previously reached prototype hardware — and cost days to diagnose — are now caught in automated runs within hours of the commit that introduced them. Defect escape rate to hardware dropped significantly.

We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. You can find out more in our policy.